跳转到主要内容

加载中... Loading...

评论家构成说明 Critic Composition Description

VULCA系统的6位评论家采用 The 6 critics of the VULCA system employ a mixed design of 真实历史人物与虚构AI角色相结合 real historical figures and fictional AI personas 的研究设计: :

✓ 真实历史评论家(4位) ✓ Real Historical Critics (4)

  • 苏轼 Su Shi (北宋文人,1037-1101)- 代表中国古典文人美学和诗画一律传统 (Northern Song literatus, 1037-1101) - Represents classical Chinese literati aesthetics and poetic-painting unity tradition
  • 郭熙 Guo Xi (北宋山水画家,1020-1100)- 代表山水画理论和形式构图法则 (Northern Song landscape painter, 1020-1100) - Represents landscape painting theory and formal compositional principles
  • 约翰·罗斯金 John Ruskin (维多利亚时期评论家,1819-1900)- 代表道德美学和社会责任视角 (Victorian critic, 1819-1900) - Represents moral aesthetics and social responsibility perspective
  • 凯特·克劳福德 Kate Crawford (当代AI伦理学家)- 代表技术伦理和人机协作批评 (Contemporary AI ethicist) - Represents technology ethics and human-machine collaboration criticism

◆ 虚构AI角色(2位) ◆ Fictional AI Personas (2)

  • 佐拉妈妈 Mama Zola (西非传统文化)- AI创建的虚构角色,代表西非griot口述传统和集体诠释范式 (West African traditional culture) - AI-created fictional persona representing West African griot oral tradition and collective interpretive paradigm
  • 埃琳娜·佩特洛娃教授 Professor Elena Petrova (俄罗斯形式主义)- AI创建的虚构角色,代表结构分析和视觉语言研究传统 (Russian Formalism) - AI-created fictional persona representing structural analysis and visual language research tradition

这种混合设计是本研究的核心实验设计:真实历史人物确保批评传统的准确性,虚构AI角色探索AI在构建新型批评视角时的能力与局限。 This mixed design is the core experimental design of this research: real historical figures ensure the accuracy of critical traditions, while fictional AI personas explore AI's capabilities and limitations in constructing novel critical perspectives.

RPAIT 评论维度 RPAIT Critique Dimensions

每位评论家使用五个维度来评价艺术作品: Each critic evaluates artworks using five dimensions: